All presentations

IP Intake
Command Centre

A source-grounded first pass for intellectual-property intake

Prototype pitch

FASTER SM smarter EVIDENCE first HUMAN reviewed
Problem

The slow part is not expertise—it is assembling the evidence

1

Scattered inputs

Emails, decks, agreements and technical notes arrive in different formats.

2

Manual cross-checking

Dates, contributors, ownership and disclosure risks must be reconciled.

3

Weak traceability

Generic chat output can sound confident without showing where each claim came from.

Solution

One intake becomes a reviewable, evidence-linked first pass

01

Collect

Form fields plus PDF, DOCX, TXT and Markdown.

02

Extract

Text is read locally in the browser.

03

Structure

Facts become findings, risks and missing questions.

04

Review

A qualified professional approves, edits or rejects.

The output remains a first-pass triage aid—not legal advice.
Working capability

The prototype reads actual documents, not just filenames

Supported input
PDF
DOCX
TXT
Markdown

What happens

  • PDF pages are extracted with page markers.
  • DOCX body text is converted to plain text.
  • Extracted text appears in the intake for review.
  • Analysis quotes supplied material rather than inventing evidence.
Local browser processing in the prototype; no upload is required.
Why this is buildable

It passes all four opportunity-scoping questions

Broader workflow
Yes

It improves the intake stage of a larger IP-review process.

Clear steps
Yes

Collect → extract → structure → review → export.

Consistent I/O
Yes

Documents and form fields in; findings and questions out.

Day 10 complexity
Medium

Ship the reviewable first pass, not autonomous legal advice.

Value

Faster and smarter—without hiding uncertainty

Faster

Removes repetitive document reading and intake re-keying.

Smarter

Links findings to supplied evidence and labels what is missing.

Closer

Keeps the professional in control with approve, edit and reject actions.

Compounding

Creates a reusable structure for future matters and team learning.

The competitive edge is not more generated text. It is faster access to checked, traceable evidence.

Demonstration

The live demo proves the whole loop in five moves

1

Open New intake

Start with a clean matter.

2

Add a document

Use authorised or synthetic material.

3

Review extraction

Show the actual text recovered.

4

Analyse intake

Generate findings and missing questions.

5

Apply judgement

Approve, edit or reject a finding.

Build plan

Day 10 should deliver a credible pilot

Now

Working prototype

Structured intake, local extraction, findings, review actions.

Next

Validation

Test with synthetic matters; measure extraction quality and review usefulness.

Then

Pilot controls

Authentication, secure storage, matter permissions and audit export.

Decision requested
Approve a small synthetic-matter pilot and define the professional review criteria.
1 / 8